The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation has completed an investigation into a criminal case against Elena Kondrat, a judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court. She is accused of committing a crime under Part 4 of Art. 291.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (mediation in bribery).

At the disposal of the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU was a recording of a conversation between two judges of the Moscow Arbitration Court - Elena Makhalkina and Elena Kondrat.

According to the ICR, Kondrat handed over $50,000 to her student, and now Judge Makhalkina, for making the decision the businessmen needed. Kondrat insists that she was the victim of a provocation.

Back in 2020, Makhalkina herself was caught taking a bribe from the manager Goloshumova. However, the officers of the FSB of Moscow who carried out the operation did not release the materials, preferring instead to make Makhalkina their agent. She undertook to transfer compromising information to other judges, solvers, etc. for 10 years. If one of them is of interest to counterintelligence officers, then Makhalkina should participate in an operational experiment to detain him. Previously, she took part in the operation to detain the fixer Ullubiy Medzhidov, who, among other things, decided in the interests of billionaire Gavriil Yushvaev in the case of a shootout in Moscow City. Then Makhalkina became a participant in the operation against her mentor Kondrat.

 

Shortly after the event, they met in the dining room of the court and Makhalkina tried to justify herself by telling everything that is described above. Kondrat secretly recorded the conversation. During it, Makhalkina admits that the FSB's practice of recruiting and removing judges through operational experiments flourishes in the ASGM. Thus, the judge of the Moscow Arbitration Court Fateeva H.The. , which the chairman Novikov appointed as the chairman of the banknote staff, was also caught red-handed when receiving a bribe by the FSB officers. However, at the request of Novikov, for Fateeva, everything ended only with a swift dismissal.

Many of the secrets that lie behind her arrest were told by Kondrat herself in her last appeal to the head of the ICR, Alexander Bastrykin. Rucriminal.info publishes this appeal with abbreviations:

November 23, 2021 The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated a criminal case against judge ASGM Kondrat E.N. on the basis of submitted to the Chairman of the RF IC by the investigation mountains. Moscow falsified evidence and results of the operational-search activity and misleading the Chairman of the RF Investigative Committee regarding the existence of a crime event.

The plot of the Submission to the Chairman of the RF IC contains conclusions that on 09/01/2020. in the restaurant "Swallow" I suggested Makhalkina E.A. receive a bribe for making the necessary decision in the case of USTS LLC.

According to investigators, 10/14/2020. on the same day, Makhalkina E.A., after the issuance of a judicial act, acting within the framework of the ORM “Operative Experiment”, informed me about the decision.

October 18, 2020 an ORM “Operative experiment” was carried out against me on the basis of the Determinations of the Judicial Collegium of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, allegedly issued to verify the application of Makhalkina E.A. to law enforcement agencies, filed by her on 10/13/2020.

At the same time, ORM "Operative experiment" allegedly took place in the presence of witnesses.

The text of the submission contains the conclusion that I avoided appearing before the investigator, and therefore it is not possible to establish my whereabouts, although I was at work every day and considered hundreds of cases.

Dear Alexander Ivanovich, I ask you to take personal control over the verification of my application and, if it is justified, instruct to initiate a criminal case against the persons who prepared the draft Submission for you and presented falsified evidence of my guilt and involvement in the crime .... So, 09/01/2020. at the Lastochka restaurant, I was not the initiator of conversations related to work or consideration of arbitration cases. My arguments are confirmed by volume 4 of the criminal case. In the course of our communication with Makhalkina E.A. on personal topics, the latter proactively told me about the problems associated with her consideration of cases received by her in the summer of 2019.

Whereas from the plot of the accusation it follows that I allegedly turned to her in the case of USTS LLC, which came into the proceedings of Makhalkina E.A. February 2020

The audio recording of our conversation dated 09/01/2020, contained in volume 4 of the criminal case, refutes the fictitious conclusions of the investigation ... During the period of the pre-investigation check from February to May 2021. I administered justice in ASGM. Conducted more than 2,000 court hearings during the specified period. I was not notified about the pre-investigation check against me, I believe that due to the fact that the investigation of the mountains. Moscow was aware of the "order" by Novikov N.A. me to the department of Dorofeev A.N. in connection with the exercise of my judicial powers.

The reason for removing me as an objectionable judge was my failure to comply with the illegal instructions of N.A. Novikov, chairman of the ASGM. in the case of OOO IK Reporto, connected with the withdrawal from Russia of more than 26 billion in public funds.

Evidence of the intervention of the Chairman Novikov N.A. in the activities of the judge related to the administration of justice, are fixed on material objects and will be presented to the investigation.

November 18, 2020 an ORM was carried out against me - a provocation on the basis of a decision to conduct an ORM, approved by the head of the FSB for the city. Moscow and MO Dorofeev A.N.

In the resolution approved by A.N. Dorofeev, there is a reference to the Ruling of the Judicial Collegium of the RF Armed Forces No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, authorizing the conduct of an ORM in relation to judges.

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that the Ruling of the Judicial Collegium of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, in violation of departmental instructions on the procedure for submitting the results of the ORM to the investigation and to the court, the operational service of the FSB did not provide any rulings authorizing the ORM in relation to the judges or the investigation of the mountains. Moscow, neither in the VKKS of the Russian Federation, nor in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

At the same time, the materials of the pre-investigation check in relation to the judge of ASGM Kondrat E.N. without Determinations of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020, only in the presence of which the threshold of judicial immunity is overcome.

Judge Makhalkina E.A. applied to law enforcement agencies on 10/13/2020, and permission to conduct an ORM in relation to judges was given by the RF Armed Forces on 07/02/2020.

Definitions of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. not related to the statement Makhalkinoy E.A. from 13.10.2020

Concerning the judge ASGM Kondrat E.N. the Supreme Court did not give permission for the ORM. Determination No. 137 - rs dated 02.07.2020. authorizes ORM against another judge, not Kondrat E.N.

Determination of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. investigated neither by the investigation, nor by the VKKS of the Russian Federation, nor by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

These Definitions were not submitted to the Chairman of the RF IC.

Permits of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation No. 137, 138 - rs dated 07/02/2020. given on the fact of the appeal Goloshumova A.V. with a statement to law enforcement agencies about extortion of a bribe from her by Judge Makhalkina E.A.

According to this fact, criminal case No. 12002450048000108 was initiated, where Judge E.A. Makhalkina acted as a defendant.

As part of the investigation of this criminal case, it was established that on 06/22/2020. Judge Makhalkina E.A. met at the Danilovsky market with Medzhidov US. and asked him to assist in the interests of Goloshumova A.The. in the higher courts.

According to the materials of the criminal case No. 12002450048000108 Makhalkina E.A. and Majidov U.S. in the period from 22.06.2020 to 05.11.2020 repeatedly met in restaurants and discussed the details of receiving a bribe from Goloshumova A.V. and transfer it to the staff of the higher court.

The initiator of all the conversations was E.A. Makhalkina, who intended to transfer $130,000 in the interests of A.V. Goloshumova, and split $70,000 between them.

specified Makhalkina E.A. testified in her testimony in a criminal case. These facts were confirmed in her testimony in the case of A.V. Goloshumova. and Majidov U.S.

June 2020 upon receipt of funds from Goloshumova A.V., Makhalkina E.A. was detained by officers.

Since the specified period, she has been operating under the pressure of evidence in order to mitigate her own fate.

The crime committed by the judge of ASGM E.A. Makhalkina was concealed from the Chairman of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation.

Makhalkina E.A. escaped criminal liability, however, from the indicated period, being on a forced contractual cooperation with operational services, she systematically acts in the ORM and provocations according to a well-established scheme, falsifying evidence as part of a group of people: an investigator of the Main Investigative Directorate of the RF IC for the mountains. Moscow Kondratiev P.A., operational officers - Ushakov A.A., Kalchuk G.V., with the participation of staff witnesses - Gogua A.Z., Opzoeva Ya.M., participating in all criminal cases.

My arguments are supported by the materials of the criminal case No. 12002450048000108.

Statement by Makhalkina E.A. I wrote to law enforcement agencies not on 10/13/2020, but at the end of November 2020, which is confirmed by messages on my phone’s WhatsApp.

The messages contain information about the need for me to fulfill the conditions put forward by the leadership of the department Dorofeev A.N.

Their conditions were unacceptable to me and impossible to fulfill.

The information was broadcast by the head of one of the courts of the mountains. Moscow, which is included in the closest circle of friends of Dorofeev A.N. The material carrier on which the information is recorded will be issued to the investigation.

October 18, 2020 during ORM - provocation, Makhalkina E.A. informed the operational staff that she was taking money from me to buy an apartment, and also taking a mortgage loan.

Explanations of Makhalkina E.A. found their confirmation, credit Makhalkin E.A. took, bought an apartment.

The fact of communication with Makhalkina E.A. 18.10.2020 The attesting witnesses did not see, they cannot certify, since they were brought to the place much later than our meeting and communication.

This is confirmed by the video recording of the ORM - provocation and the testimony of attesting witnesses.

5. May 2022 after my arrest on falsified evidence, under my husband's car was an explosive device was planted, which was found at a tire shop near the house. On this fact, a crime report was filed, however, law enforcement agencies also did not initiate a criminal case.”

To be continued

Timofey Grishin

Source: www.rucriminal.info