19 years ago, on October 23, 2002, one of the most terrible tragedies of our time took place in Russia - the taking of hostages at the Theater Center on Dubrovka. At that moment the musical "Nord-Ost" was being held there. The number of spectators and participants in the performance was 916 people, and they were captured by terrorists for 4 days. Among those who carried the hostages unconscious from the musical Nord-Ost was Maksim Zhukov, an active fighter of the special forces "Alpha" at that time. Earlier, he eliminated terrorists in Beslan, covering children with his body and carrying them out of a burning school in his arms. Now Zhukov is in jail. And the materials regarding the earlier convicted swindler Alexander Bukov, who sent him there, lie with the first deputy chairman of the TFR Eduard Kaberneev without movement.
Zhuko filed a statement with the FSB FSB of the Russian Federation, in which it was reported about the criminal actions of Bykov, about his friends from the 8th department of the "K" Department of the FSB of the Russian Federation and the falsification of evidence in a criminal case against Zhukov himself.
According to the message of the Internal Security Service of the FSB of Russia, information about the criminal actions of A.Yu. Bykov. found their confirmation and materials of the check in respect of Bykov A.Yew. were sent back in the summer to the SK of Russia for a decision. However, according to the materials of the check, no decision has been made to date, although more than two months have passed. According to Rucriminal.info, the materials are formally assigned to the investigator, but in fact lie with the Deputy Head of the Investigative Committee of Russia Eduard Kaburneev.
Recall that Zhukov and Tsapko I.V. - a veteran of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, who received many wounds during the establishment of constitutional order in Chechnya and has a huge number of state awards; he is being held in a pre-trial detention center according to the statement of a previously convicted Bykov.
In 2018, Bykov A.Yu., positioning himself as an excellent financial specialist and a successful businessman working under the "roof" of the Office of the FSB of the Russian Federation, met with Tsapko I.V. Later Tsapko I.The. introduced Bykov A.Yu. with Solovyan M.G. and Zhukov M.The.
Bykov, referring to his connections, offered his new acquaintances to take part in a profitable financial project, he was allocated a large sum.
According to our interlocutor, due to the expiration of the loan term and the lack of dividends from investments, in the fall of 2019 and in particular on October 29, 2019, in the Goodman restaurant located in Moscow, at 2 Odessa Street, M.V. Zhukov ., Tsapko I.V., Solovyan M.G. met with A.Yu. Bykov. and offered him to return the money, while they did not use any violence, they did not express threats, and did not ask other people about it.
This meeting on October 29, 2019 took place at about 6 p.m. in a crowded place, in the indicated restaurant, in the presence of some bank employees, in which A.Yu. Bykov worked at that time. and in the presence of employees of the Goodman restaurant, some of whom were interrogated by the investigation and confirmed that there were no conflicts in the restaurant on October 29, 2019.
After this meeting, Zhukov M.V. immediately went home, and Bykov A.Yu., Tsapko I.V., Solovyan M.G. went to Naro-Fominsk to take a steam bath.
In November 2019, Zhukov M.V., Tsapko I.V., Solovyan M.G. decided to contact the police about the fraud by A.Yu. Bykov, which was reported to A.Yu. Bykov. And he hurried to write a statement addressed to the head of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation, Ivan Tkachev. And immediately this statement was launched.
According to the information available to the editorial office of Rucriminal.info, Bykov attached to the statement of 04/03/2020, in support of the allegedly received from M.V. Zhukov. and Tsapko AND.The. Injuries and threats attached some medical certificate and disk DWD-RW X10200103503.
We continue to publish an investigation about this criminal story.
The fake discharge epicrisis presented by Bykov was submitted for a decision to the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region and served as the basis for the instruction by the investigator Linkov in the text of the decision to initiate a criminal case against the veteran of the special anti-terror unit "Alpha" Zhukov M.The. and the hero of the Chechen war Tsapko I.V. inaccurate information about the infliction of at least 20 blows on Bykov's body, which gave reason for the investigator to go to court with a petition for the election of the most stringent, exceptional preventive measure in respect of these accused in the form of detention.
After the lawyer's petition to verify the fact of Bykov's appeal to the "GBUZ City Polyclinic No. 3 of the Moscow Department of Health" for medical assistance, on July 14, 2020, the investigator of the Main Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region, Linkov applied to the "GBUZ City Polyclinic No. 3 of the Moscow Department of Health. "With a request to confirm the fact of Bykov's appeal for medical help
07/15/2020 "GBUZ City Polyclinic No. 3 of the Moscow Department of Health" gave the answer to investigator Linkov (Appendix No. 4) that:
- Bykov from 11/22/2019 to 11/25/2019 for medical help at GP No. 3, namely, he did not apply to the department of paid services,
- discharge epicrisis, outpatient card of the patient No. 32104/19 in the name of Bykov signed by doctor Barashchuk - were not issued,
The seal and signature of the doctor Barashchuk do not correspond to reality.
On July 21, 2020, Linkov interrogated Barashchuk, to whom he presented the discharge summary, the patient's outpatient card No. 32104/19 addressed to Bykov, Barashchuk said that she did not know such a patient, the epicrisis did not correspond to the form of the established sample, the epicrisis was not signed by her or her seal.
On July 22, 2020, Linkov interrogated A.Yu. Bykov for a "tick". being in the apartment of his friend in Zelenograd, he allegedly found the doctor of the state polyclinic number 3 on the Internet, after which the doctor of the state clinic number 3 of the Moscow DZ (located next to the Mayakovskaya metro station. Where is Zelenograd, and where is the Mayakovskaya metro station !!!). So, a doctor named Elena merrily waving a yellow suitcase in his hands (as the editorial board believes in this yellow suitcase was an X-ray machine weighing several tens of kilograms and a cost of under a million rubles and who was diagnosed with Bykov's terrible trauma - arteriovenous rupture of the thigh) came to Bykov's home in Zelenograd and handed him certificates of appeal by A.Yu. Bykov. in the GP No. 3 DZ Moscow, as well as a certificate from the trauma center of the GKB No. 1 im. Pirogov (really, why not please the respected patient).
But at the same time, the "inexperienced young man" Bykov, allegedly did not realize that these certificates were fake.
Meanwhile, in Moscow, any schoolchild who falls off a bicycle knows that patients come to trauma centers by gravity, or if the patient cannot walk, then he is delivered by ambulance to the emergency department of the corresponding hospital and, depending on the situation, the patient is sent to the corresponding department, right up to the intensive care unit.
It should also be noted that Bykov, with a blue eye, admitted to the investigator that he had given the so-called doctor Elena cash for the certificates on the street next to the Mayakovskaya metro station, but at the same time the investigator Linkov did not suspect Bykov of falsifying these medical certificates and devoutly believed in angelic sincerity Bykova A.Yu., let's not forget to remind, previously convicted by the Presnensky District Court for fraud !!!
But let's go back a little, to the employee of the 8th department of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation Burov, who "with clean hands, a hot heart and a cold mind" made a certificate on billing ORM "SITKS" and indicated in it that on October 29, 2019 Bykov arrived at the address Odessa house 2, where Tsapko, Solovyan, Zhukov were waiting for him, then the specified persons, except Zhukov, drove in the direction of Naro-Fominsk, while, to this certificate, Burov did not attach Zhukov's phone billing, therefore, indicated falsified information about Zhukov's whereabouts. Later, the investigators of the RF IC will write an analytical note, in which they will indicate, having studied the billing, that according to the detailing of telephone calls Zhukova M.The. it follows that the latter, in a cafe at st. Odessa was not.
Burov in the certificate on the results of the ORM "SITKS" in relation to Bykov, Tsapko, Zhukov, Shubin, Kostin, Taranenko, Solovyan indicates that from the evening of 10/30/2019 to 11/14/2019, Taranenko and Bykov are constantly together and this is confirmed by technical data , however, at the same time, Taranenko applies billing only for 10/29/30/2019 and 11/07/2019, and Bykov's billing from 10/29/2019 to 11/14/2019.
At the same time, Burov does not apply billing for 11/07/2019 to Bykov.
An interesting detail is the fact that after a bath in Naro-Fominsk, a heavily drunk Bykov and his bodyguard Taranenko (whom Bykov later introduced as a kidnapper) were accommodated in the Villa Granda hotel in a room on the ground floor with windows without bars, with a door from the inside closing on a turntable - a lamb, that is, not with a key. At night Bykov repeatedly went online from his phone, which also denies that someone kidnapped him and forcibly kept him in the hotel room.
On November 5-10, 2020, the investigator of the investigation group of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia drew up a protocol on the examination of objects (documents) from which it follows that on weekends in November 2019, Taranenko was in the town of Maloyaroslavets, Kaluga Region, that is, at his place of residence, which refutes the version of the investigation that Taranenko was constantly with Bykov, so that Bykov would not run away anywhere.
In other words, Burov, in the SITKS certificate, falsified the data that Roman Taranenko allegedly was constantly with Bykov and that he could not escape from Taranenko.
According to the billing of the Investigative Committee of Russia, Taranenko spent about a week in Maloyaroslavets out of two weeks of work as a security guard at Bykov (at his request), while Bykov was in Obninsk at that time. These two cities are located at a distance of about 30 kilometers from each other, while Taranenko does not have a car !!!
As follows from the detailing of Zhukov's telephone conversations, on October 29, 2019, after 6 pm, Zhukov's whereabouts are determined in Moscow, and not in a bathhouse in Naro-Fominsk. (Appendices e 6)
In addition, according to the testimony of Bykov himself and other persons (Kostin, Rakovsky, Tsapko, Solovyan, Taranenko), on October 29, 2019, Zhukov was not in Naro-Fominsk, in Kostin's bathhouse.
Despite all this evidence, Investigator Linkov, in his report to the head of the Main Investigative Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia for the Moscow Region, in order to harm Zhukov's right to freedom of movement, Zhukov's right to a legal and objective investigation of a criminal case, indicated falsified information that Zhukov allegedly together with Tsapko, Solovyan and Bykov went to the bathhouse in Naro-Fominsk on October 29, 2019.
Burov in a report addressed to the Deputy Head of the Service - Head of Department "K" 4 Service of the FSB of Russia Tkachev I.I. also indicated deliberately false information about the conduct of the ORM "investigation" of Bykov's phone, which received threats from Tsapko in the period from 14 to 17 November 2019 ... ".
In fact, instead of examining Bykov's phone, Burov conducted a study of the CD that Bykov received from Bykov and onto which Bykov, as he wanted, selectively downloaded audio messages from Tsapko. (Appendix No. 5).
The fact that Burov conducted a study only of a compact disc on which Bykov purposefully and selectively collected 13 audio messages subsequently led to the fact that, within the framework of the criminal case, a linguistic examination was carried out only on these 13 audio messages, which in turn led to incompleteness of the linguistic expertise.
09/14/2020 Yuldasheva Y.A. attached to the case file submitted by the witness Tsapko M.The. a copy of the notarial evidence securing protocol.
This notarial protocol contains absolutely all messages between Bykov and Tsapko.
However, in spite of the fact that the investigation had all the correspondence, 13 audio messages, examined by Burov on the disk, and not on Bykov's phone, were also left for the linguistic examination.
It turns out that if Burov had conducted a study of all Bykov's phones and all his correspondence with the persons involved in the criminal case, then the linguistic examination would have concluded that there is a business relationship between the persons involved in the criminal case and there is a debt, which Bykov does not deny.
If Burov had studied all the correspondence from all Bykov's phones (and not just the messages he had taken out of the context of the conversation) there would have been no grounds for initiating a criminal case.
When Burov, with surprising readiness, played along with Bykov with selective correspondence, he simply helped Bykov to falsify evidence in a criminal case, acting, in essence, Bykov's accomplice. And all this was done under the strict guidance of Abdrafikov, head of the 8th department of the Directorate of the FSB of the Russian Federation. Who personally went to the Prosecutor of the Moscow Region and the Investigative Committee of the Moscow Region, where he pushed through the initiation of a custom-made criminal case in his own interests, hiding behind the name of Tkachev AI or keeping him informed, but we will find out about this a little later.
Timofey Grishin
To be continued