While her husband German Yelyanyushkin is busy with matters of national importance as deputy governor of the Vladimir region and decides how to drag developers from the Moscow region to the construction industry market of the Vladimir province, in order to increase wealth, exclusively personal, the wife of the statesman does not waste time and came to her husband in the capital of the region, Mr. Vladimir. As the telegram channel of the Cheka-OGPU notes, G. Yelyanyushkin, expelled from the Government of the Moscow Region for corruption scandals, was put in the grain direction - housing and communal services and construction. There is a lot to cut in order to support a young wife who does not climb out of the gloss, beauty contests and bodybuilders.
As Rucriminal.info found out, when he was the head of the Moscow Canal Federal State Budgetary Institution, Yelyanyushkin organized a raider seizure of land near the canal (within a radius of 150 meters) using fake documents from the 1930s, the times of the NKVD OGPU. I'm not kidding.
At the beginning of 2019, the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Moscow Channel” flooded the Mytishchi City Court with lawsuits. The essence of the claims was that allegedly the borders of the land plot, which belongs on the right of permanent perpetual use of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Canal named after Moscow” (a plot with KN 50:12:0000000:95), do not coincide with the boundaries of a certain allotment project as far back as 1938 of the year!
Documents that the site with KN 50:12:0000000:95 belongs to the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Canal named after Moscow” on the right of permanent unlimited use, representatives of the channel could not provide the court. Moreover, the representatives of the defendants submitted to the court a written refusal of Rosreestr to grant this right to the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Canal named after Moscow”.
At the same time, the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Canal named after Moscow” asked to reclaim land plots from residents in the ownership of the Russian Federation, without having the authority to do so. FGBU does not have the powers of the Russian Federation.
And to prove that the plots of residents should go to the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Canal named after Moscow", a judicial land surveyor's examination was supposed to. All court decisions were based solely on expertise.
This examination was carried out by IP specially hired by the channel, such as IP Kolodnikov, IP Verkhoturov - who had never conducted such examinations before. According to Rucriminal.info, IP Kolodnikov at that time was generally in the register of unscrupulous suppliers.
The experts were also asked questions of a legal nature, such as: to determine whether a specific disputed land plot is included in the boundaries of the project for diverting the Moscow Canal (it is up to the court to decide whether it is included or not!). At the same time, the canal diversion project itself from 1938 was not provided to the expert. This document simply did not exist. He was made up. And instead of a project for withdrawal, the expert was given a yellow sheet of A3 paper with the title “Borders of exclusion and sanitary zones” without a seal or date of manufacture. Where everything was drawn by hand. As experts from the Moscow Institute of Geodesy and Cartography (MIGAIK) would later establish, these sheets of paper were nothing more than working drawings made even before the construction of the canal, for earthworks, i.e., how and where to dig.
And the experts (IP Kolodnikov, IP Verkhoturov) involved in the examination of these documents of the 30s (without a seal and signature) performed dozens of identical, carbon-copy examinations, for an amount many times higher than the real cost of such examinations on the market (for budget money!). All statements in the UK about the forgery of the examinations, of course, were turned back. The answer was - let the court understand.
.jpg)
The conclusion of these examinations was one - the disputed section is included in the non-existent project for the allotment of the Moscow Canal dated 1938. In fact, the court's decision consisted entirely of the channel's statement of claim and forensic tests.
At the same time, the Moscow Canal Federal State Budgetary Institution officially agreed on the boundaries of the land plot with KN 50:12:0000000:95 with all adjacent land users back in 2009. What are the supporting documents in the land management case. And now, 10 years later, the Moscow Canal Federal State Budgetary Institution decided (Elyanyushkin decided, to be more precise) that the boundaries of the site with KN 50:12:0000000:95 do not coincide with the allotment project of 1938!
And despite all this, the judges of the Mytishchi City Court ruled in favor of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Moscow Canal”, taking away land plots from bona fide owners. One plot, which was selected in such a brazen way, and the decision was approved by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, belonged to a single mother, who inherited this plot from her grandfather, the leading agronomist of the collective farm named after. Timiryazev, who received this plot from the collective farm back in the 60s of the last century.
Separately, I want to note the work of the judges of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region (ASMO). Which, despite the established judicial practice of the Mytishchi City Court (by that time, more than 50 decisions had been made in favor of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Canal named after Moscow”) were able to sort out this case, establish the truth, involving professional experts from the Moscow Institute of Geodesy and Cartography in the examinations. Which established that the submitted documents have nothing to do with the withdrawal project. And even if and conduct research, then the measurement error in some places can reach 600 meters!!! And this is despite the size of the land plots themselves 10 by 15 meters and the width of the Moscow Canal itself - 85 meters. The error of such measurements according to the law for the lands of settlements should be no more than 0.1 meters. And then 600!
So. Although the judges of the Mytishchi City Court understood the situation perfectly. And some judges, after the meeting, did not hesitate to say: we understand everything, but we were given a command.
On dozens of applications to the Investigative Committee of the Moscow Region about the falsification of documents in court, the results of forensic examinations, evidence, obviously unjust decisions, no action was taken. People not only were not refused, they simply did not respond to their applications. And who is involved in investigating crimes against justice? That's right - the Investigative Committee. And who at that time was in charge of this direction in the Main Investigative Committee of the TFR in the Moscow Region? That's right - the deputy head of the GSU Sarafanov!
And after the shameful dismissal by the decree of President Sarafanov from the investigative committee, where did Sarafanov get a job? Headed the security service of the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Moscow Canal". Interesting "coincidence", isn't it?
To be continued
Timofey Grishin
Source: www.rucriminal.info
