It is not news that the Russian elite loves to talk about duty and love for the Motherland. Usually attacks of patriotism roll over them somewhere in the palaces, but these are trifles, right? If you listen to them, all of them, from oligarchs and politicians, to artists and sportsmen, are just holy unmercenaries, aren't they? Take, for example, Alexei Tereshchenko, Honored Master of Sports, three-time ice hockey world champion. At the same time, in each interview, he tells how much he loves Russia, and what a wonderful country it is. And unofficially he tells everyone that he plays hockey with Putin.
In general, Alexei is an extremely lucky fellow. In 2005, he was thrown out of Dynamo Moscow. But already in 2008 he got into the Russian team. Evil tongues claim that such a rapid rise occurred after a solid reward, which our hero then began to regularly pay to whomever needed for signing his contracts with a good salary. But we will be above idle gossip. Moreover, Alexey turned out to be not only a talented hockey player. His ability as a businessman is awe-inspiring. In 2011, he immediately joined the founders of two companies. The first is Sanpromsnab with assets over 100 million rubles (the founders are Maria Titova and Sergey Sobolev). The second is Joint Stock Company Innova Invest Group (share capital 100 thousand rubles). A great start for a person who has neither business experience nor specialized education. After all, everyone knows that employers are always ready to give a person from the street 50% of their business.
It is curious that Sobolev, the former founder of Sanpromsnab, who seemed to have sold his share to Tereshchenko, did not receive a penny from him, later he will say that there was no deal, hinting that someone forged documents and provided them to a notary . The most interesting thing is that the general director of the Sanpromsnab company also did not prepare and did not sign the documents on Tereshchenko's purchase of a share from Sobolev, moreover, he did not even see Tereshchenko, did not meet or communicate with him ever. But perhaps the person simply forgot. Well, he knows, someone forgets where he put his keys. And someone cannot remember to whom he wrote off 50 million assets.
According to Rucrminal.info, the same 2011 turned out to be very successful for Alexei's mother, Tatyana Tereshchenko. During this period of time, two completely strangers decided to give her a piece of land in the Moscow region with a total area of 32 hectares, for the construction of a holiday village, worth about 800 million rubles! And again, the competent authorities are not ready to see corruption here, as well as ask questions to my mother why she is suddenly given such gifts. But perhaps an unemployed lady of fifty years with a ponytail just won the hearts of some billionaires from the FORBES list or just officials.
On the other hand, Uncle Tereshchenko, an active member of the regional police, was not so lucky. In 2013-14, he was arrested for a large bribe. Alexey honestly tried to help a relative, through his agent he found someone to give and gave a bribe of almost $ 1 million so that his uncle would be given a suspended sentence. However, something went wrong, Tereshchenko was deceived, and his uncle received 5 years in prison. Tereshchenko himself, by the way, was told that his uncle could have received a fine from above in the amount of 150-200 million, and so the court limited itself to imprisonment. Classic scam!
But back to Tereshchenko. In 2012, Innova Invest Group, with assets of 100 thousand rubles, issues a loan to the Irkutsk hippodrome for a year of 6 million at 20% per annum. Where did the company, which did not operate and did not even issue shares, find 6 million? There are two options: either Tereshchenko turned out to be an incredibly talented businessman and earned several million from scratch in a year. Of course, in 2012, 6 million just appeared on the company's balance sheet, which appeared during the sale of promissory notes of a new company with a zero balance. Only 6 years later, in 2018, Tereshchenko himself will "honestly" declare in court that the record was fake and the company did not receive any money for the bills, although the money was received on the company's current account (Case A40-262566 / 18-111-2229 ). That is, the company that paid for the bills of "Innova-Invest Group" was simply scammed, appropriating this money to itself. But no one connected this with the hippodrome.
And the loan that was issued to the Hippodrome is not returned, which looks strange, given that the authorized capital of the Hippodrome alone was 1,225,695,000 rubles. Yes, that's right: a company with one billion, two hundred and twenty-five million, six hundred ninety-five thousand rubles in reserve did not have 6 million. It looks like they just forgot about it. Or we see a scheme when a profitable former state-owned enterprise is being pulled to pieces. One way or another, in 2013 Tereshchenko goes to court, where on February 7, 2014 he successfully collects the debt. (Case A40-1152673/2013).
In 2015, Tereshchenko demanded that the Hippodrome be declared bankrupt (Case A19-1506/2015). The matter dragged on until 2022. And, although the Hippodrome was saved, the organization with billions in assets fell by 94% (to 77 million) and is now I am in the process of liquidation. Rest in Pease Irkutsk Hippodrome.
In 2018, Tereshchenko goes to the police, writes a statement that someone allegedly illegally sold the property of Sanpromsnab. Tereshchenko lied to law enforcement agencies that he allegedly transferred 24 million rubles to the company in exchange for a 50% stake in the company. And then he was illegally expelled from the list of founders. And everything would be fine, only the examinations carried out by the police showed that Tereshchenko did not sign, among other things, documents on joining this LLC. Law enforcement officers were also bewildered by the fact that for 6 years Alexei was not interested in the work of the society, where he gave tens of millions. Well, you know, this is participation in annual meetings, studying reports on details, in a word, all the things that founders usually do who are interested in recouping the invested funds. The company itself, by the way, had been liquidated by the tax authorities by that time, since the company did not submit reports and did not conduct activities.
Not surprisingly, the police refused to prosecute. But at the end of 2019, the material of the check came to the investigator Nizkina. She did not ask unnecessary questions and immediately became "excited", and so much so that she concocted the accusation by adding false evidence and false information. However, let's be indulgent to the lady, few people could resist such a charismatic (and rich) guy. By the way, after this, Mrs. Nizkina's business went uphill, she almost immediately received a promotion, becoming deputy head of the SCH ATC of the Eastern Administrative District.
And in 2020, Alexey went to the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region, demanding, for a start, to restore the liquidated Sanpromsnab (case No. A45-912 / 2020). A company that has been 100% owned by Alexander Davydov since 2012. Davydov, by the way, by a strange coincidence, was arrested in 2018, and was in prison. Yes, when necessary, the police work extremely quickly. Especially if you are a famous hockey player. Then the person who offended you will go to jail in the blink of an eye.
Tereshchenko's interests were represented by his close friend Tatyana Kosykh. Spiteful critics assure that between them is far from a working relationship. Some even claim that for the sake of a charming lawyer, Tereshchenko left his wife and two children. It is ironic that Mrs. Kosykh, at the same time, heads the fund for helping children, telling how sorry the poor unfortunate babies are. However, perhaps in this way she "saves" Tereshchenko's children from the pernicious influence of the pope (and his money).
Judge Pakhomova behaved very strangely. She sided with Tereshchenko, arguing that he was a former founder and would be able to restore the violated right in this way. But here's the catch: the court in its decision refers to the materials of the criminal case. And there is an expert's conclusion, according to which the signature in the minutes of the meeting of the founders (the same one according to which Tereshchenko allegedly received a share) was also not made by Tereshchenko. That is, in fact - an outsider came and demanded something from the company. But the person who was listed as the founder (Davydov) was not allowed to participate in the process. Well, it so coincided that on the dates of the court hearings (there were about 11 of them in total), for some reason he ended up in a punishment cell, then in a punishment cell. An amazing coincidence!
Moreover, judge Pakhomova, for some reason, did not ask how it happened that the founder allowed his company to be excluded from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. After all, this is not a one-time process. First, the tax office starts sending notifications to the company. Then publishes data on the upcoming liquidation. By the way, all this is reflected in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, the data of which is available online (and free of charge). If Tereshchenko wanted to run the company so badly, where has he been all these years? Why have you only heard about it now? Why didn't he bother to send a simple zero report? Not to mention the fact that the “theft” of property is known only from the words of Tereshchenko. The judge did not care about all these "trifles". The fighters against corruption would already have decided that someone financially “stimulated” Ms. Pakhomenko. But why throw such terrible accusations? Perhaps the whole thing is in the charisma of Alexei. No, seriously: a tall, stately man, a hockey star. Well, what lady refuses to please him?
Then Tereshchenko once again goes to the Arbitration Court of the Novosibirsk Region. But already demanding to include him among the founders of Sanpromsnab and, accordingly, to throw Mr. Davydov out of the founders (Case A45-7921/2021). The application goes to judge Aidarova. And Davydov again has problems with participation in the court session. But he sent a written response, where he reasonably pointed out that the limitation period, which is three years, was missed, which means that the claim should be dismissed. That is, if in 2011 Tereshchenko was allegedly thrown out of the founders, then the statute of limitations expired in 2014. You know, 2011 + 3 = 2014. It seems that even first-graders can do this. But not Judge Aidarova. She decided that the statute of limitations should be considered from 2017, because, in her opinion, Tereshchenko could not have known earlier that he had been expelled from the founders. Apparently, the judge is not aware that even then there was such a thing but, like "EGRLE online", when you enter the name of the company or its TIN and you can see who is the director, who is the founder, where the company is located. The judge also ignored such a thing as the annual meetings of the founders. This is the kind of thing that, by law, members of an LLC must do. And, you know, if you don't get invited to your LLC meeting for a few years, maybe the builder wonders what's going on there?
It is curious that the judge also ignored the conclusion of the expert, who showed that the signature in the minutes of the meeting of the founders (thus, according to which Tereshchenko allegedly received the share), was also not made by Tereshchenko. That is, he has no reason to demand that he be recognized as the founder. But on August 24, 2021, Judge Aidarova rules in favor of Tereshchenko.
But the most interesting thing is that a year later, the same judge considered the case, where Tereshchenko was already the defendant. One of the former owners of Sanpromsnab tried to challenge the agreement under which Tereshchenko allegedly bought a stake in the company (Case A45-14322/2022). Guess from what date the judge decided to calculate the statute of limitations? Yes, since 2011, well, because changes were made to the Unified State Register of Legal Entities on May 31, 2011 and, we quote the judge, “Exercising the due degree of care and discretion, Titova M.V. could learn about the alienation of the share of Tereshchenko A.V. due to the sale of a part of the share of the authorized capital of the company, starting from May 31, 2011.
It is curious why Mrs. Aidarova did not demand this due diligence from Tereshchenko? What made her change her position so drastically? Did you find out about the existence of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities? Did you find a math textbook? However, maybe she considers hockey players not very smart people, and therefore does not require them to be cautious, which she expects from adults and reasonable people.
And Tereshchenko, meanwhile, continued his victorious march in the courts of Novosibirsk. This time, he demanded to invalidate the contract of sale of the building, which was allegedly stolen from him. Case A45-140/2023 came to Judge Ostroumov. He, too, had trouble calculating the statute of limitations. Well, who there likes to joke about female intellect? Here a man cannot add 3 and 1. By the way, he went further than Aidarova and decided that the three-year term for a deal made in 2011 should be counted from 2021. Why? Well, because “there was no relevant and admissible evidence that the plaintiff knew, or should have known about the contested transactions earlier than the plaintiff himself indicates, was not presented to the court.” Sound reasonable?! May be. But there is a nuance here: the Civil Code of the Russian Federation insists that the plaintiff must prove the validity of the reasons for missing the limitation period. That is, it is enough for the defendant to declare this. And the plaintiff then has to explain where he was worn for so many years, and why he did not show "reasonable diligence." And the judges (even Mr. Ostroumov himself) adhere to this position. But for Tereshchenko, he made an exception. He also fell under the spell of a handsome man, his wallet or his young mistress and part-time lawyer Kosykh, whom he, without hesitation right at the meeting, sang smiling diferambs, joked and flirted with her. ? However, in our tolerant and progressive time, this happens. One way or another, the judge returns the property to the Sanpromsnab company (where Tereshchenko now has a 50% stake, thanks to judge Aidarova). It should be noted that in his decision Judge Ostroumov almost completely copied the decision of his colleagues. Programs for comparing documents show that the description of the essence of the dispute, without reference to laws, is approximately 70-80% identical to the decisions of Aidarova and Pakhomova. Rewrite is clearly not Judge Ostroumov's forte.
Are you planning to buy an apartment or a house? Pray that this property does not interest anyone.
But that's not all. You remember that Tereshchenko was a shareholder of Innova Invest Group. Guess what lawsuit he filed with the firm in the same 2020? That's right: he demanded to throw out the second founder, who, what a coincidence, at the time of filing the lawsuit is located and lives abroad. On what basis did Tereshchenko demand this? Allegedly, he did not issue shares and did not appoint a director of the company. Here is a curious moment: Alexei actually admitted that the company was a dummy. Then how did this firm manage to borrow more than 6 million rubles from the Hippodrome? But the court ignored these questions. The court did not consider it necessary to notify the defendant himself, whose share Tereshchenko planned and took away.
They did not become interested in the court why Tereshchenko did not care for 9 years what was happening with the shares, who was the holder of the register and who was the director. And Alexey's mother became the director of Innova Invest Group.
However, not all judges are so blind, deaf and incompetent. In Moscow, apparently more intelligent, competent and healthy judges. Plaintiffs are suing Tereshchegko, indicating that the hockey player borrowed money from them, loans, but was in no hurry and in no hurry to return .. Courts in the capital are not as blind and deaf to Tereshchenko as in Novosibirsk, Tomsk. So, in 2021, a certain Pisareva to whom Tereshchenko did not give 14 mln rubles. about a year taking under ninterest for one month, collected 4 million rubles from Tereshchenko in the form of interest. (Case No. 2-931/2021). At the beginning of 2023, two creditors immediately filed claims against Alexei Tereshchenko for non-repayment of borrowed funds and interest on them: the well-known collection agency Phoenix LLC (Case 02-4607 / 2023) - the largest in Russia, and the large bank Expobank JSC ( Case No. 02-1748/2023).
Apparently, Alexei has some health problems, with memory, that he does not remember about companies, about his debts, about assets, about loans. Is it the consequences of playing hockey or something else?
Roman Trushkin
To be continued
Source: www.rucriminal.info
